<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring Automated Trading Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2009/05/12/exploring-automated-trading-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2009/05/12/exploring-automated-trading-systems/</link>
	<description>Information and resources for those looking to learn about trading and the markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:17:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2009/05/12/exploring-automated-trading-systems/#comment-14196</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 02:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/?p=1239#comment-14196</guid>
		<description>I believe in automation and systems, but one needs to make his own due diligence as well. Ask questions: Does the developer trade his/her&#039;s system? Is the market liquid enough to absorb many traders for that system? 

One needs to define what is a trading system. Some systems provide entry only, some have risk management built in, some have amazing auto execution while others rely on manual submissions.  

The idea of &quot;why would some one sell a system?&quot; is just a bit to negative and while it has a winning tone in an open forum, cant be applied across all systems. 

Here are some additional questions I would ask: 

In my honest opinion here are the question you should ask a system developers: 1) What is the amount of drawdown? 2) What is the capital required 3) The cost of execution 4) has it been tested in real time vs. hypothetical 
4) Could it be traded in real time? 5) What platform is it executed on? 

I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe in automation and systems, but one needs to make his own due diligence as well. Ask questions: Does the developer trade his/her&#8217;s system? Is the market liquid enough to absorb many traders for that system? </p>
<p>One needs to define what is a trading system. Some systems provide entry only, some have risk management built in, some have amazing auto execution while others rely on manual submissions.  </p>
<p>The idea of &#8220;why would some one sell a system?&#8221; is just a bit to negative and while it has a winning tone in an open forum, cant be applied across all systems. </p>
<p>Here are some additional questions I would ask: </p>
<p>In my honest opinion here are the question you should ask a system developers: 1) What is the amount of drawdown? 2) What is the capital required 3) The cost of execution 4) has it been tested in real time vs. hypothetical<br />
4) Could it be traded in real time? 5) What platform is it executed on? </p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2009/05/12/exploring-automated-trading-systems/#comment-14175</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/?p=1239#comment-14175</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If you had a system that always made money, would you sell it for a few measly dollars? Of course not. No one would.&lt;/em&gt;

Mark - I&#039;m not so cynical as that, but it&#039;s a legitimate point because a lot of system developers have the belief that if they share their system they will ruin it. That&#039;s not generally likely to be the case, but paranoia tends to win out. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If you had a system that always made money, would you sell it for a few measly dollars? Of course not. No one would.</em></p>
<p>Mark &#8211; I&#8217;m not so cynical as that, but it&#8217;s a legitimate point because a lot of system developers have the belief that if they share their system they will ruin it. That&#8217;s not generally likely to be the case, but paranoia tends to win out. <img src='http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wolfinger</title>
		<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2009/05/12/exploring-automated-trading-systems/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wolfinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/?p=1239#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâ€™ve gone on record as saying that Iâ€™m not a fan of folks buying systems&quot;

The part that simply amazes me is that pepole expect an off-the-shelf system to make money.

These people have to use their brains for a moment:  If you had a system that always made money, would you sell it for a few measly dollars?  Of course not.  No one would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™ve gone on record as saying that Iâ€™m not a fan of folks buying systems&#8221;</p>
<p>The part that simply amazes me is that pepole expect an off-the-shelf system to make money.</p>
<p>These people have to use their brains for a moment:  If you had a system that always made money, would you sell it for a few measly dollars?  Of course not.  No one would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: theessentialsoftrading.com @ 2012-02-12 12:00:43 -->
