<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picking apart more trading rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/08/15/picking-apart-more-trading-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/08/15/picking-apart-more-trading-rules/</link>
	<description>Information and resources for those looking to learn about trading and the markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarcoA</title>
		<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/08/15/picking-apart-more-trading-rules/#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator>MarcoA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/?p=561#comment-12589</guid>
		<description>Re: multiple indicators - I never saw the point of filtering a low probability indicator with another low probability indicator. Glad to see it mentioned here. Using a filter with the intent of taking only higher expectancy trades seems sensible, but results in fewer trades. Will the expectancy per trade increase sufficiently to offset the lower trade frequency, smaller historical test sample size and possibly poorer execution?. I don&#039;t have an answer, but losing the emotional tie to individual outcomes is definitely easier with higher trade frequencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: multiple indicators &#8211; I never saw the point of filtering a low probability indicator with another low probability indicator. Glad to see it mentioned here. Using a filter with the intent of taking only higher expectancy trades seems sensible, but results in fewer trades. Will the expectancy per trade increase sufficiently to offset the lower trade frequency, smaller historical test sample size and possibly poorer execution?. I don&#8217;t have an answer, but losing the emotional tie to individual outcomes is definitely easier with higher trade frequencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: theessentialsoftrading.com @ 2012-05-23 20:11:20 -->
