<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trading System Rules I Disagree With</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/06/06/trading-system-rules-i-disagree-with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/06/06/trading-system-rules-i-disagree-with/</link>
	<description>Information and resources for those looking to learn about trading and the markets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Shepard</title>
		<link>http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/index.php/2008/06/06/trading-system-rules-i-disagree-with/#comment-12343</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Shepard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/?p=505#comment-12343</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There are many profitable systems which have sub-50% win rates. Itâ€™s the combination of win rate and winner/loser ratio which determines system expectancy, not just win rate.&lt;/i&gt;

I totally agree. My best system (or style of trading) has a Hit Rate lower than 50%, but the losses, while more frequent, are smaller (baring gaps) then my winners by a wide margin. I think win-rates can be &quot;rigged&quot; too much and give a skewed perspective on system profitability.

I agree with you about the usage of Stops (very system dependent), although I confess that I couldn&#039;t trade without some level of Stop Loss (not a mental Stop either).  Be it far enough away to let the trade &quot;breath&quot; (avoid being knocked out by market noise), but still present in case of a blow out.

You blogs are great. Keep up the great work.

:-)

~Keith</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>There are many profitable systems which have sub-50% win rates. Itâ€™s the combination of win rate and winner/loser ratio which determines system expectancy, not just win rate.</i></p>
<p>I totally agree. My best system (or style of trading) has a Hit Rate lower than 50%, but the losses, while more frequent, are smaller (baring gaps) then my winners by a wide margin. I think win-rates can be &#8220;rigged&#8221; too much and give a skewed perspective on system profitability.</p>
<p>I agree with you about the usage of Stops (very system dependent), although I confess that I couldn&#8217;t trade without some level of Stop Loss (not a mental Stop either).  Be it far enough away to let the trade &#8220;breath&#8221; (avoid being knocked out by market noise), but still present in case of a blow out.</p>
<p>You blogs are great. Keep up the great work.</p>
<p> <img src='http://theessentialsoftrading.com/Blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>~Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Requested URI is rejected)

Served from: theessentialsoftrading.com @ 2012-05-23 13:56:52 -->
